Search for: "State v. CERTIFIED SERVICES, INC." Results 821 - 840 of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2019, 12:31 pm by Phillips & Associates
The plaintiffs in Griffin were employed by a company that “provides local warehouse services and transportation services. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:41 pm
A copy of the complaint with exhibits can be downloaded here.In February 2005, WYD engaged F&R’s legal services (most likely in connection with a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by Who's Ya Daddy, Inc., the owner of the identical mark for clothing, against WYD in 2005 -- Who's Ya Daddy, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:11 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Bancorp, Domino’s Pizza, Roth Staffing/Ultimate Staffing, Tommy Hilfiger Retail, LLC, Certified Tire & Service Centers, Inc., MetroPCS California, LLC., Jack In The Box and Skilled Healthcare, LLC. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:16 am by John Jascob
Moody Investors Service, Inc., September 22, 2016).The Supreme Court granted cert in the IndyMac case in 2014, but withdrew it as improvidently granted after learning that the district court was reviewing a tentative settlement. [read post]