Search for: "State v. Case" Results 821 - 840 of 193,574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2024, 12:43 pm by John Floyd
” In May 2022, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) confronted a contentious case, State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 12:16 pm by Mac Kelly
By Mac Kelly On Aug. 7, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in Kyser v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 8:07 am by Karel Frielink
This is partly due to the flood of European directives that EU member states must implement in their own legislation. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The third lesson about state building is to look at the judiciary. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 4:36 am by Barry Sookman
Slowly, courts are winnowing out the plausible claims as the 26 or so cases wind through the courts in the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 4:32 am by Jeremy Telman
I blogged about this case after oral argument, and SCOTUS produced the predicted 6-3 party-line endorsement of public corruption. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 3:45 am by Peter J. Sluka
  But in cases of equal treatment—the manager deciding against distributions to any member—the courts generally defer to the business judgment of the manager (see, e.g., Simon v Moskowitz, 193 AD3d 520 [1st Dept 2021] [discussed in this post]; Estate of Alexander Calderwood v Ace Group Intern. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 11:00 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In sustaining the verdict, the Court rejects the Town's efforts to scale back the scope of the FHA, enacted in 1968 to prohibits discriminatory housing and rental practices.The case is Gilead Community Services v. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 9:06 pm by Michael Douglas
In that case, it was confirmed that Art. 28 Model Law does not require arbitrators to apply the law correctly. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
This fall, state supreme courts in Michigan and Pennsylvania will hear cases challenging their states’ use of life without parole sentences. [read post]
In 2022, a federal district court dismissed the case, stating that the curfews constituted a valid public safety regulation that “left open ample alternative channels for expressive activity. [read post]