Search for: "State v. David." Results 821 - 840 of 14,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Monday’s oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 12:07 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
David Lundberg, No. 114,897 (Sedgwick)State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
 Lord Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice David Richard concurred. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:02 am by Matthew Campbell
On Friday, August 11, 2023, United States District Judge David Nuffer of the United States District Court of the District of Utah granted motions to dismiss the cases challenging the Bears Ears National Monument designation. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm by pittlegalscholarship
David Forte (Cleveland-Marshall Law) presents “Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
For a copy of Ninth Circuit's decision (dated April 25, 2007), please use this link: Hudock v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 4:58 pm
What follows is Stanford student David Owens’ write-up of oral argument in Haywood v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 10:02 am
Contents include:ArticlesSaar A Pauker, Admissibility of claims in investment treaty arbitration Menalco J Solis, Adverse inferences in investor–state arbitration Ana Fernández Pérez, Conflicts of interests of arbitrators in international law firms Christian Armbrüster, Arbitrators’ remuneration in discontinued proceedings Recent DevelopmentsAbimbola Akeredolu & Chinedum Ikenna Umeche, Arbitrators’ impartiality and independence: commentary on… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:54 am by Eugene Volokh
From Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David Wecht's concurrence yesterday in Bert Co. v. [read post]