Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 821 - 840 of 4,507
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
”  The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
M’Intosh’s discovery doctrine in Wi Parata v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:01 am by Saloni Khanderia
Ltd. v Diaconicolas & Capsopolus, the court stated that regardless of how ‘novel, original or striking’ the colour scheme may be, it was not a feature that was relied upon by the ordinary purchaser to identify the source of the product. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
New York Democratic state legislators’ first choice might be that neither they nor the Republican-dominated legislatures in red states have the legal option of drawing a congressional district map that systematically overrepresents their own party. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am by Eric Goldman
Overturning Tiffany v. eBay In 2010, the Second Circuit issued a watershed decision about secondary trademark infringement. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:37 am by Kevin
Thank you to the reader who recently alerted me to this important opinion: Campasano v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
  The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 8:23 am by admin
To satisfy the requirements for express consent under CASL, the sender must state the purpose (or purposes) for which the consent is being sought, include prescribed sender identification in the consent request and all of the following specific information set out in the Regulations (SOR/2012-36, section 4): (i) the name by which the person seeking consent carries on business, if different from their name (if not, the name of the person seeking consent); (ii) if the consent is sought on… [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am by Florian Mueller
Two days later, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will finally hold its postponed (due to Hurricane Ida) hearing in Continental v. [read post]