Search for: "State v. Dream"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am
And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
Garcia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:04 am
Lamensdorf v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:29 am
” Nike, 663 F.3d at 98; see also Ditri v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
If that were truly the state of the law, it would be every UGC website’s dream. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
And the other two Republican appointees (Judges Kozinski and Clifton) are hardly a prosecutor's dream. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:27 am
Was the rule of Georgia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:03 am
Today was the day that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave judgment in Case C‑351/12, OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s., a reference for a preliminary issue from a Czech court, the Krajský soud v Plzni. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:56 am
Stout v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:35 am
This world essentially is more or less the dream of Mao’s cultural revolution or 1984–to basically subordinate every individual to the collective and have us all live in one great comradeship. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
There, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
The tragic risks exist even at that level of are more than obvious as I saw a Rutgers player crack his neck on the MetLife Stadium field in the Rutgers v Army game a couple of years ago.Todays post is shared from the nytime.com/. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:22 am
Jazz music to Jazztel's ears, the Supreme Court upheld the Madrid Court’s decision, possibly putting the nail in the coffin of Orange’s (squared) colour monopoly dream in Spain.Also recalling previous Spanish and EU case-law (among other things, the CJEU decisions in Case 104/01, Liberteland in Case C-49/02, Bauchemie), the Supreme Court stated that colours generally lack of distinctive character and cannot play a proper distinctive role, as consumers… [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
See Landrigan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am
Also on H-Net is a review of Exit Strategies and State Building edited by Richard Caplan. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:28 am
For this reason, he writes, "Local Law 17 is a bureaucrat’s dream. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:51 pm
In Ricci v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
” Commissioner v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Daniel Webster is thought to have coined that phrase in his oral arguments in the Supreme Court case, McCulloch v. [read post]
