Search for: "State v. E. W. B." Results 821 - 840 of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:48 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm by PaulKostro
“[W]e evaluate a claim of abuse [or neglect] by looking to the harm suffered by the child, rather than the mental state of the accused abuser, because ‘[t]he main goal of Title [Nine] is to protect children. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:11 pm by Scott McKeown
As pointed out by the Court in Polaris “[w]e have observed that the prejudice of hindsight bias often overlooks that the genius of invention is often a combination of known elements which in hindsight seems preordained. [read post]