Search for: "State v. Fisher"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,016
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
* In Cold Comfort Farmers Cards: Californians feel New Zealand chill, Katfriend Ken Moon (AJPark) writes about ruling of the New Zealand Court of Appeal in a software copyright and trade secrets dispute, Karum Group LLC v Fisher & Paykel Finance [2014] NZCA 389. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:57 am
"Much depends on Dura’s credibility," the court said, stating it was possible a jury could see Dura’s explanation as a pretext, or find that the drug test had targeted information about employees' physical or mental health, regardless of Dura’s stated intent.But it was not a matter of law that Dura violated the ADA.The case is Bates et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:42 am
Secretary of State for Transport [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
From Katfriend and long-time respected IP commentator Ken Moon (AJPark) comes news of a 13 August ruling of the New Zealand Court of Appeal (Harrison and Miller JJ) in a software copyright and trade secrets dispute, Karum Group LLC v Fisher & Paykel Finance [2014] NZCA 389, which was heard this June. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:59 am
See Fisher v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 1:01 pm
A: Reliable enough.United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
” As Lyle reported for this blog earlier in the week, Abigail Fisher has asked the full U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
” Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:58 pm
In its important 7-1 ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Fisher’s lawyers had taken her constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that the university had not justified the race-conscious part of its admissions plan that it adopted in the wake of the 2003 decision by the Justices in a University of Michigan Law School case (Grutter v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 7:35 am
.)United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth further stated that its protocol would not violate [Gelfgatt’s] rights under . . . the 5h Amendment to the United States Constitution. . . . [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
” Also last Thursday, in McCullen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
Jacobs of Greenwire and Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
