Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 821 - 840
of 8,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 3:50 pm
The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:21 am
Every state. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm
Palmer v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:35 pm
Apple 5G patent dispute:Ericsson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Holder (Attorney General) v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm
Holder which is a significant defeat, I think, for the public domain in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm
Recent Supreme Court cases that affect issues of criminal sentencing: United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
Digital Ally, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Fla. 2002) (quoting State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Holder, the Voting Rights Act case; or Hollingsworth v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 8:02 pm
Citizens or green card holders. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:38 pm
A recent unpublished decision issued by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on May 21, 2012, in Kiefer v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
Pelkey, holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 does not preempt state-law claims relating to the storage and disposal of a towed vehicle, as well as the Court’s cert. grant in Burnside v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:02 am
Instant Infosystems, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:47 am
In so ruling, the Court clarified questions left behind by cases such as Quality King v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
The 1953 case in which the Supreme Court established it, United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:25 am
Holder. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:50 am
Hayes Holderness Assistant Professor University of Richmond School of Law As covered in earlier posts (here, here, here, and here), the Supreme Court is currently considering the case of South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:02 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC19348 - Efstathiadis v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
The petition claims the Fifth Circuit’s decision leaves copyright holders “at the mercy of state infringers. [read post]