Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 12:49 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm
January 25, 2018) (putative class action brought by shareholders under federal securities laws against defendant INC, a publicly traded clinical research organization, for allegedly issuing false press releases, artificially inflating the stock price, and deceiving investors about the company’s prospects and business relating to a potential acquisition by INC of inVentive Health, Inc. on or about May 10, 2017) Lightsey, et al. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm
January 25, 2018) (putative class action brought by shareholders under federal securities laws against defendant INC, a publicly traded clinical research organization, for allegedly issuing false press releases, artificially inflating the stock price, and deceiving investors about the company’s prospects and business relating to a potential acquisition by INC of inVentive Health, Inc. on or about May 10, 2017) Lightsey, et al. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm
January 25, 2018) (putative class action brought by shareholders under federal securities laws against defendant INC, a publicly traded clinical research organization, for allegedly issuing false press releases, artificially inflating the stock price, and deceiving investors about the company’s prospects and business relating to a potential acquisition by INC of inVentive Health, Inc. on or about May 10, 2017) Lightsey, et al. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 am
Though these limits did not significantly restrict state owned enterprises or individual investors in China's wealthier coastal regions, they imposed significant barriers for individual investors and for businesses in the less developed regions. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
In SEC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
In SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
In another unpublished opinion, Gerber v. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE SEC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 5:09 pm
Supreme Court’s March 24, 2015 opinion in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:31 pm
In a securities case, this means that you can only sue on behalf of investors that reside in a particular jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Titles V and VI - Relaxation of mandatory Exchange Act registration standard for record holders Increases number of record holders triggering mandatory registration to 2,000, no more than 500 of which may be unaccredited Excludes holders of employee benefit plan securities Increases thresholds for bank holding companies Implementation: Effective immediately. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:06 am
Pauley denied (in large part) defendants’ motion in Ganek v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:37 am
Respondents to the 2014 Global State of Information Security® Survey reported a 25% increase in detected security incidents over 2012 and a 45% increase compared to 2011. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
