Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
Most originalist scholars today believe that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies all or nearly all of the Bill of Rights against the states, following the pioneering work of Akhil Amar and Michael Kent Curtis on this issue. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:45 am
It is significant that every court to have addressed this issue since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
JUBIE, individually, Appellants (Defendants) v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
Kneeland, 37 Mass. (20 Pick.) 206 (1838); State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
McLaughlin, III, of the New Kent County Sheriff's Office, obtained a search warrant for [Rideout’s] residence. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:41 am
United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:13 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports on the Supreme Court proceedings in the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
See Landrigan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:00 pm
United States Abramski v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:51 pm
Arkison United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
MOATS v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm
If past is prologue, the case could be as important as Kent v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:26 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s much-anticipated decision in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford (Bedford) represents an important victory for sex workers’ rights. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:36 am
” At ACSblog, Kent Greenfield suggests that Harris v. [read post]
