Search for: "State v. List"
Results 821 - 840
of 27,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 8:49 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:00 pm
Additionally, the notice letter is supposed to provide information advising the individual or entity of their right to appeal their inclusion on the list.[7] V. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:05 am
The Court also granted review in State of Texas v. $281,400 in US Currency, the case in which the Court made a formal CVSG request last fall. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 7:28 am
" This ruling came in State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
First out of the chute is United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:59 am
Ars Technica and Wired.com report that Oklahoma State University, after receiving the order to show cause in Arista v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:15 am
Ct. 2527) the Supreme Court found the introduction of state forensic-lab reports is testimonial evidence requiring the appearance at trial of lab technicians.Here is a list of some subsequent decisions:Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:12 am
Candidate on military duty must be eligible and reachable for appointment for name to be placed on a special military list following dischargeMatter of Woods v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:15 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:47 am
California Growers Association v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:06 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Medical Malpractice Opinions Body: Below is a list of medical malpractice Appellate Court opinions issued in November 2009:  AC30614 - Anghel v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Here: amicus_merits_us ACLU Amicus Brief 13-1496bsacPuyallupTribeOfIndians 13-1496 Amici Brief States 13-1496 bsac Historians and Legal Scholars 13-1496bsacNationalCongressOfAmericanIndiansEtAl 13-1496bsacNationalIndigenousWomensResourceCenter 13-1496 bsac Cherokee Nation et al These briefs are also available at our regular page of background materials on the case, along with all the other briefs so far. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
(listing factors to consider). [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 11:03 am
CPU Litigation, Bledsoe et al v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The New York State Department of Civil Service or a municipal civil service commission, as the case may be, on its own initiative or upon the request of an appointing authority, determine if an individual whose name appears on an eligible list, or who has been appointed from an eligible list, should be disqualified for appointment to the position. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The New York State Department of Civil Service or a municipal civil service commission, as the case may be, on its own initiative or upon the request of an appointing authority, determine if an individual whose name appears on an eligible list, or who has been appointed from an eligible list, should be disqualified for appointment to the position. [read post]
