Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 821 - 840
of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2016, 4:03 am
Also of interest in this case is the court’s reference to Lord Sumption’s judgment in Zakrzewski v District Court in Torun, Poland [2013] UKSC 2, which stated that “as a general rule the court of the executing state is bound to take the statements and information in the warrant at face value. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
I remember all too well how Lord Justice Kitchin gave a speech at Munich's Ludwig Maximilian University in early 2019 which was essentially just a defense of his own Unwired v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:37 pm
Michigan: On October 19, Director Fox published Bulletin 2020-41-INS/BT/CF/CU, which supersedes Bulletin 2020-38-INS/BT/CF/CU, stating the following: On October 12, 2020, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order in House of Representatives v Governor, Docket No. 161917, stating that, consistent with the ruling In re Certified Questions and effective immediately, the Executive Orders issued under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act “are of no continuing legal… [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 4:15 am
Among the numerous challenges, the complaint (full text) in Reinoehl v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Chaplain Firtko recited the Lord’s Prayer, stating “Our Father who Art in Heaven. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
Lord Wilson observed that, where it is necessary to attribute a human state of mind to a company, it is necessary to determine which persons’ mental processes will count as those of the company. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 6:31 am
Pix credit BBC hereIn For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) [2025] UKSC 16, the U.K. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson conclude that there was no basis for the presumption and, accordingly, the judge erred in dismissing the appellant’s application relying on that observation. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
Lord Dyson MR, Richards and Black LJJ held that SIAC had no power to impose bail conditions on B because his detention was unlawful. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:31 am
The Court: The State of Texas v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:33 pm
The Court: The State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
-Gen. v Punch Ltd [2003] 1 AC 1046 at [87]-[88] in the Court of Appeal and at [95] in the House of Lords; and Jockey Club v Buffham [2003] QB 462 (Gray J). [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Rix, Lloyd and Wilson) gave its ruling in Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd, [2009] EWCA Civ 753.At issue in this dispute was the shape of Whirlpool's retro-looking KitchenAid Artisan mixer and its rival, Kenwood's kMix. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Fourthly, in Majrowski the House of Lords he [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Hodge and Lord Sales gave the main judgment with which Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Leggatt agreed. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
In R v Asfaw [2008] UKHL 31, recalling the Refugee Convention’s broad humanitarian aims Lord Bingham explained that minority persons fleeing persecution “may have to resort to deceptions of various kinds (possession and use of false papers, forgery, misrepresentation, etc) in order to make good their escape. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
Decision Lord Hamblen delivered the only judgment, with which all the other Lord Justices agreed. [read post]
