Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 821 - 840
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
From New York trial judge Ariel Chesler's opinion last month in Z.U. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Sarmiento and Sharpston view Zambrano (C-34/09, EU:C:2011:124), which caused a stir because of the substance of rights test, as a “high-water mark” in the CJEU’s jurisprudence. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
It must be for the applicant to state clearly the type of monopoly for which he contends. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
There has been previous comment here on the various stages of Banks v Cadwalladr, and the facts have been well-stated. [read post]
3 May 2016, 8:17 am
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:40 am
V V sought to register the following trade mark in Singapore (the “V V Mark”): However, its application was opposed by Twitter, which relied on its prior registration for the following mark (the “Twitter Mark”). [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The season ended with a particularly interesting argument in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:25 am
Lodestar Anstalt v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm
In a forum that has taken pains to praise United States v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Jim Jordan compelling Mark Pomerantz to testify before Congress? [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Jim Jordan compelling Mark Pomerantz to testify before Congress? [read post]
