Search for: "State v. McDonald"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 11:06 am
"But already Chicago has passed a new gun ordinance, and, yes, a lawsuit has been filed arguing that the law is unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm
On this record, holding that the ban is constitutional as applied to Kanter does not “put[] the government through its paces,” see Williams, 616 F.3d at 692, but instead treats the Second Amendment as a “second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,” McDonald v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:27 pm
We are a national state with our own laws. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:24 pm
From Hardaway v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:06 am
But, even though the police are excited from being on the trail of a suspected drug mule, the Eighth Circuit held, in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Melissa Butler and Judge Stephanie McDonald who took the time and effort to share their passion for appellate work. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
McDonald’s Corp. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
McDonald’s Corp. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Similar to Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
McDonald, 823 F.3d 630, 639 (Fed. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
”*** The Court of Appeals has already decided that health insurance for retirees is not a retirement benefit protected against being diminished or impaired by the State's Constitution [Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313].** Regarding a municipality's providing health insurance benefits to its retirees, in McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, a decision that could significantly affect a municipal retiree's… [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
Just ask McDonald’s. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
((McDonald v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am
“[W]hether the pleading was sufficient to state a cause of action for legal malpractice posed a question of law which could be determined on a motion to dismiss” (see Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 1985]). [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm
In Murray Braun v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 12:24 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
