Search for: "State v. Parente"
Results 821 - 840
of 14,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2017, 4:30 am
Facts: Mother and Father are the divorced parents of four children. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:45 pm
In a NY Matter, J.F. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 9:31 am
SEWELL V. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm
The question in A.S. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
On August 30th, the state’s highest court overruled its prior holdings and expanded the definition of parent to grant a standing to seek custody to a domestic partner who agreed with the biological parent to the conception of a child and the raising of the child together. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
On August 30th, the state’s highest court overruled its prior holdings and expanded the definition of parent to grant a standing to seek custody to a domestic partner who agreed with the biological parent to the conception of a child and the raising of the child together. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Facts: Mother and Father are the married parents of several children. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
A.C. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:39 am
Simcox v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am
In, Panteleris v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
But if the women aren't, in fact, registered with the state as domestic partners or married, they will need to do an adoption or bring a parentage action under the UPA to get full legal clarity and protection for the parent and child relationships of non-birthing partner and child. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:25 pm
Any agreement between the parents to raise the children in the United States was not dispositive. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
However, controversy stems both from the very character of the offence – the notion that it intrudes improperly on parental rights – and from the fact that it is an offence of strict liability – the prosecution does not need to prove that the parent acted in any way unreasonably in failing to secure the child’s attendance at school (see Islington LBC v D [2011] EWHC 990 (Admin)) or even that the parent knew about the absence (see Crump… [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:25 am
Cabinet for Health and Family Services v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 11:00 am
In Lasche v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 9:57 am
In Barton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
Estate of Manolios v. [read post]
