Search for: "State v. Rice" Results 821 - 840 of 934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm by Nora Ellingsen
Green card holders live in the United States as our neighbors and serve in our Armed Forces. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
Last month in the Courts On Monday 29 July 2024, Collins Rice J heard an application for a final injunction in the case of Northcott v Hundeyin KB-2023-002761 On the same day Johnson J heard a contempt application in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
A registry will be created by IMPI with the aim of recognizing GIs and AOs protected abroad, in accordance with the international treaties and the provisions established in Chapter V. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
If Condoleeza Rice said Bush's foreign policy was a disaster, she'd be fired. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:44 am
" On 25 March 2008, in Medellín v. [read post]