Search for: "State v. Ross " Results 821 - 840 of 1,819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
Conduct, 45 AD3d 927, 929 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 701 [2008]; Matter of Ostad v New York State Dept. of Health, 40 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Corines v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at the decision. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 7:30 am by Susan Schneider
;Ross Pifer, Director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at The Penn State Dickinson School of Law;Michael Roberts, Senior Counsel, International Affairs, Roll International CorporationRusty Rumley, Staff Attorney, National Agricultural Law Center.Our visiting faculty were also prominent participants in the conference, with Neil Hamilton, Professor, Drake University Law School and Director of the Drake Agricultural Law Center and David Grahn, Office of General… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
While is why the Sixth Circuit (over a dissent) just applied Chevron and Rust v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Plaintiffs: Which discriminates against out-of-state fuels and overrides an EPA rule. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Coverage comes from Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST, while commentary comes from Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog, Preston Burch and Timothy Verrall at the Ogletree Deakins blog, and Daniel Fisher at Forbes. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 3:45 am
Second, s 51(xxxi) does not appy the States; that is, the States can acquire property compulsorily without providing just terms (see Pye v Renshaw (1951) 84 CLR 58). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:09 am by Scott Bomboy
The primary constitutional question debated at the Court on Tuesday in Department of Commerce v. [read post]