Search for: "State v. S. D. M."
Results 821 - 840
of 9,674
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 6:17 am
As I noted yesterday, I'm still trying to fully digest the Netchoice v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Rescue Mission v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
Because I wanted to see cases from the 4/1 (San Diego), and yet this opinion clearly states right on the caption that it's from Orange County. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
But it's unacceptable for Apple to deprive app developers of the opportunity to decide what's best for their products in the eurozone.Apple is the dictator that rules everything.This issue of Apple deciding on currency conversion even came up in the Epic Games v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:35 pm
" That statement just touts the "quality, security, and better user experience" of Apple's App Store and warns against "[m]aking exceptions for larger players" (i.e., Spotify). [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:33 am
In reality, virtually 100% of all app developers who are aware of Epic Games v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 7:48 am
A decade ago, Russia’s president, Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
In Epic Games v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
See NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Professor Cheng may have over-generalized in stating that judges are epistemically incompetent to make substantive expert determinations. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
See Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:16 pm
I'm not saying allegedly on that. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I’m also grateful to Jeff Abramson for his really valiant role as moderator, given the necessarily limited time available and the necessity to truncate remarks. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
State, 944 So. 2d 317, 332–33 (Fla. 2006) (citing cases); People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am
United States v. [read post]
