Search for: "State v. Small"
Results 821 - 840
of 16,791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
At least in the context of numbers of one race v. another race in a district, regardless of the shape of the district, states may have to take into account the total percentage of a minority and make sure their redistricting does not dilute that race's voting power. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
Elster, involving whether the United States Patent & Trademark Office violated the First Amendment when it refused to register the trademark “Trump too small. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
This first post will discuss the overall biopharmaceutical market and the FTC’s stated theory of harm. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
This first post will discuss the overall biopharmaceutical market and the FTC’s stated theory of harm. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:20 pm
On Tuesday, in Nuziard v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm
R. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 11:07 am
From Doe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Early in his law career, Sam co-authored Patt v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:26 pm
But under City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:43 pm
[3] See Jones v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:27 pm
" Rumsfeld v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:32 am
Romania and Al Nashiri v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Blue-sky laws were needed “to protect the humble, honest citizens of the state, unlearned in the intricacy of business affairs as being conducted at this day, from being plundered and despoiled of their small earnings” by the “unscrupulous, cunning and deceitful. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:03 pm
United States, saying, “In particular, ‘the right to criticize public men’ is ‘[o]ne of the prerogatives of American citizenship. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am
. [* * *] In 2016, Google received a copy of a Miami-Dade County default judgment in MergeworthRX, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
The case, Vidal v. [read post]
