Search for: "State v. Stai" Results 821 - 840 of 16,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2007, 3:28 pm
UPDATE: The D.C. government's motion for a stay indicates that an appeal to the Supreme Court would include these questions: "(1) whether the [Circuit Court] panel decision conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:10 am by Arthur F. Coon
On January 17, 2017, the California Supreme Court denied the losing appellants’ petition for writ of supersedeas, stay request, and petition for review of the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Mission Bay Alliance v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In the latest episode of dueling orders, the Alabama federal district court in Strawser v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
Circuit granted the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) motion to stay the vacatur of the Trump administration’s Clean Power Plan Repeal Rule until EPA conducts further rulemaking on the issue in the case of American Lung Association v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 6:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The case is from the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, and is styled, Ronald Mason v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:04 am by Scott A. McKeown
(although a bit more “brute force” than our proposal) In TDY Industries Inc., v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:45 am by INFORRM
[Update]  On 17 May 2016, the President of the European Parliament wrote to the Court stating that the immunity procedure had been initiated and, as a result, Warby J granted a stay pending receipt of the Parliament’s opinion. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:01 am by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an initial case management conference in Continental v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:16 pm by Derek T. Muller
Husted (2016): application for stay October 25, 2016; denied October 31, 2016Arizona Secretary of State’s Office v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:36 am
  This is the first published California decision addressing the issue since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]