Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
Parity is the state or condition of being equal, and addresses the inherited inequalities of pay, status, or political representation. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 11:55 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:45 pm
Dean v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:35 am
Board of Education — striking down Plessy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:10 am
Miller puts closely-held corporations in a particularly bad place, allowing corporate funds to be “pilfered to fund family feuds and board arguments without any regard to fiduciary obligations or safeguards for the corporate interest” unless they choose to opt out of advancement, an option that could be equally harmful to the corporation. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 4:05 pm
In the case of the Bresten v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 7:17 pm
Volta, the Board concluded that "it was not reasonable for applicant to state use dates in a use-based application for goods upon which he had no use. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
Comstock also could have obtained equally lucrative pay packages in other deals C&J mulled.C&J’s board also understood that Nabors would need to gain control of the surviving entity in order to bring about a tax-driven domicile change to Bermuda. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
MITCHELL v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
In Middleton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Board of Educationwas met with persistent and orchestrated resistance. [read post]
Del. high court says undisclosed post-merger role made Tower CEO self-interested, board ill informed
12 Jul 2020, 5:40 pm
July 25, 2019) The majority of the en banc court said at the motion-to-dismiss stage, the undisclosed prospect of a post-merger CEO job with a five-fold pay increase for Towers’ lead negotiator would have been a conflict-of-interest concern if revealed to his board – especially since Haley subsequently supported a minimum price increase , Justice Karen Valihura, writing for the majority, said the high court’s standard for a duty of candor charge, stated in… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
Schwinge v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Equality v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
We are on board with that. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
Target Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:30 pm
"Nearly 25 years after Batson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
