Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Sullivan, 559 N.W.2d 740, 747 (Neb. 1997) (dictum), followed in Nolan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:27 am
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:19 am
Sullivan and hiQ v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
But the Supreme Court, in its 1977 decision in Zacchini v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:28 am
Kagan told Maryland solicitor general Steven Sullivan that even if the state is correct and the challengers have not “shown how much is too much” – that is, come up with a workable standard – “however much you think is too much, this case is too much. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:10 pm
Washington State Senator Cantwell and Alaska State Senator Sullivan have been negotiating over the terms of a compromise to allow the vessel to enter the American fishery. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:10 pm
Washington State Senator Cantwell and Alaska State Senator Sullivan have been negotiating over the terms of a compromise to allow the vessel to enter the American fishery. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
The 186th edition of the IPKat’s news roundup.DesignsKat friends Nina O’Sullivan and Victoria Wilson reported on the 2017 key design cases brought before both the EU and the UK’s courts in The best and the brightest: key UK and EU design decisions from 2017.Speaking of key decisions, following the DOCERAM v CeramTec CJEU judgement (C-395/16), Kat friend Alexander Haertel discusses the decision in detail and its possible repercussions in German design law on the… [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 2:50 pm
Sullivan, Facebook's case is analogous to Dun and Bradstreet v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:20 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States in Shelley v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
According to corporate finance experts at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, the 2011 SEC CF Guidance jump-started a new era of cyber-disclosure in public company filings, which most public companies have now already integrated into their SEC disclosure processes: “Following the [2011 SEC CF Guidance’s] Release, many public companies included additional cybersecurity-related disclosures in their annual and quarterly reports, often in the form of risk factors, as well… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
Kat friends Nina O'Sullivan and Victoria Wilson from Mishcon de Reya in London report on these developments. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:33 am
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018, the New York State Court of Appeals ruled in a 6-0 judge opinion in Heeran v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:48 am
In the Court of Appeal (Hallett LJ, Sullivan LJ, Arnold J) the Claimant’s appeal was dismissed. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 3:56 am
See also Hearst Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:38 pm
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
