Search for: "State v. Superior Court" Results 821 - 840 of 11,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
On April 7, 2020, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court rendered its decision in New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:15 am by Hull and Hull LLP
The Ontario Superior Court recently considered the application of the principle of proprietary estoppel in an estate dispute in its decision in Cowderoy v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Shea Denning
Turns out it also is apropos for this week’s court of appeals decision in State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Shea Denning
Turns out it also is apropos for this week’s court of appeals decision in State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Shea Denning
Turns out it also is apropos for this week’s court of appeals decision in State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Superior Court of California‘s “experience and logic” test requires invalidation on First Amendment grounds of a Delaware statute authorizing state judges to act as arbitrators in business disputes — when the parties voluntarily select arbitration — because the arbitration proceedings are not open to the public. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 5:01 am by Brian M. Wright
In a published decision in 2014, the court of appeals held that factual disputes prevented the superior court from granting the State Patrol’s summary judgment motion, thus submitting the question to the jury. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:12 pm by Richard J. Webb
     The next meeting of the New Jersey State Bar Association's Dispute Resolution Section will feature a program addressing the implications of two recent decisions of the Superior Court, Appellate Division: Estate of Ruszala v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:07 am
"Given all this, it's somewhat surprising that the Court of Appeal decided to hear the writ. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
Indeed the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same sex couples.'By those words and many others contained in the 138-page ruling in Perry v. [read post]