Search for: "State v. Sweet"
Results 821 - 840
of 972
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
Stone Sweet & F. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:07 am
Here is Judge Sweet's reasoning from KIRK , -against- HEPPT, ESQ., 05 Civ. 9977;UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
Redd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:06 pm
For Jayda’s lawsuit, check out Horizon Group Management, LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Well now, Tina Bates, accompanied by her similarly situated friends, is signing songs about California in “Sweet Home State Court. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 12:48 pm
Holk v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:25 pm
. - Brittan is a minor celebrity on the legal interwebs as one of the plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:22 am
V. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Coffey v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
(And granola is too sweet for my taste). [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
The operative portion of Senator Specter's bill is short and sweet: Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 10:29 am
State: That sound you hear are the nails being driven into the appellate issues over preemptory strikes by the 3rd DCA in this short, sweet, and decidedly state oriented opinion:Affirmed. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:19 pm
Ed. 2d 639 (1980) (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:46 pm
*See Milton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:45 am
Norma McCorvey of Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
Retailer Name Street Address City State 1 Yoss Thriftway Old 71 Highway P.O. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
Pickering v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
But, the big wheels (of justice) keep on turning, sending Freebird back to sweet home Kansas state court. [read post]
