Search for: "Stephens v. United States" Results 821 - 840 of 3,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
United States and to recognize “Congress’s clear intent that victims of spurious forfeiture cases not emerge from the process injured. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  We discuss whether courts made the correct decision in such cases as Windsor v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Shultz Former Secretary of State   General Michael V. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:01 am by Howard Bashman
Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court in part in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm by Amy Howe
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Ian Gershengorn tried to turn the case around. [read post]