Search for: "Stock v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 5,595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2010, 10:56 am by Julie Lam
., (the Act) in 1994 to allow Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) to purchase the state accident fund, a for-profit workers’ compensation insurer, BCBSM formed the Accident Fund as a wholly-owned, for-profit Michigan stock insurance subsidy. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:07 am
Garnat Trading & Shipping (Singapore) PTE LTD (Garnat) and Vung Tau Shipbuilding Industry Joint-Stock Company (Vung Tau) v Baominh Insurance Corporation (Baominh) [2010] EWHC 2578 (Comm), concerned the loss of a floating dock (carrying a floating workshop) which sank in the course of being towed on a voyage from Vladivostok in Russia to Vung Tau in Vietnam.Garnat and Vung Tau were insured for the floating dock and workshop under a contract of hull insurance for a single voyage… [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
While the Court supports its ruling with over 50 pages of factual findings, its holding was essentially a foregone conclusion once the Court determined that it agreed with the reasoning of VFB LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:51 am by John Stigi
May 14, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court’s exclusion of an event study as unreliable under Daubert v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:46 am
In Latvian Shipping Co v Russian People's Insurance Co (ROSNO) Open Ended Joint Stock Co [2012] EWHC 1412 (Comm) the Court considered the appeal of an arbitration award on the grounds of serious irregularities within the Tribunal's findings.The dispute, which arose out of a policy of insurance, concerned the question of whether the damage to the propeller of the "Ojars Vacietis", a vessel owned by Latvian Shipping Co (LSC), had occurred when she grounded (an… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Neither said why, but statements filed with the secretary of state reveal that Baxter owns stock in BP Amoco and Corrigan in E.I. duPont de Nemours. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
In short, the court stated that Defendants were attempting to impose Revlon duties, as applied to Maryland law in Shenker v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:28 pm by Elizabeth A. Patton
This morning, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated ruling in the Lee v. [read post]