Search for: "Strange v. Powers" Results 821 - 840 of 970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am by John L. Welch
Does it matter whether the overlooked item is closely related to the other(s): for example, overlooking "v-necked t-shirts" in a list of 100 clothing items may be more readily excusable than overlooking "nuclear power plants" in an identification that lists only "chewing gum and nuclear power plants. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:50 am by michael a. livingston
That a then Yale professor and later Federal judge (Ralph Winter) was the brains behind the original challenge to campaign finance laws, in Buckley v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Latinos, Corporate Power and the Supreme Court By Angelo Falcon   Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in the appeal of Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
From a legal perspective, the depicted firm has several strange conflicts of interests. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
Strange bedfellows here Fatal attraction here [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm by Corey Rayburn Yung
GENERAL KAGAN: I think the power, Justice Scalia, is the power to run a responsible criminal justice system, to run a criminal justice system that does not itself endanger the public.The fact that the government has refused to identify an enumerated power throughout the arguments in this case is still strange. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:17 am
Let us explain: Back in 2001, Congress passed a strange half-a-loaf piece of legislation, signed by President Bush, concerning the tax. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:08 pm
Merpel doubts that orders of this nature have much of a chilling effect in the United Kingdom anywhere, where the media are so powerful and the mechanisms for law enforcement so puny. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:20 am by Don Cruse
The Court did grant the State's motion to particpate in the upcoming oral argument in City of Dallas v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:39 am by Matt Brown
A few lawyers have told me the view this as a Marbury v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football products, owned the… [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
They write: The Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]