Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
As New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals noted in Schneider v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 10:07 am
Recently Bruce Craig, a retired lawyer from the Wisconsin Department of Justice in the area of consumer protection, published an interesting article on multilevel marketing: An Investor’s Guide To Identifying Pyramid Schemes. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
He is also interested in the Consumer Reports question: why does CR get NYT v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:27 pm
TweetOver the next week or so I’ll hopefully be catching up on a few things that I haven’t been able to get to from the last several weeks, the first being the new Nasdaq and NYSE compensation committee listing standards: By way of background, Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by adding new Section 10C which requires that the Securities and Exchange Commission adopt… [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
How much do we trust courts v. signals from the PTO? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:09 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Valentina reports on two trade mark decisions (T-69/14 and T-70/14) that the General Court has just delivered as regards the chance to obtain a perpetual monopoly on the shape of a bottle of water -- two bottles, actually.* Sensory copyright : IPKat, BLACA team up for a joint eventJeremy informs readers that on Tuesday 24 February the IPKat weblog will be teaming up with BLACA to host an exciting meeting on sensory copyright. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
V. versa. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:47 am
In Rottner v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
Serova v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:14 am
The court also could have (but didn’t) cited Estavillo v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:15 am
A “vaguely defined” trade dress shouldn’t be protected. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
” But unlike false advertising, publicity rights don’t depend on how consumers interpret “claims. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
As a result, Apple's interest in protecting the integrity of its iPhone 5c -- and potentially other generations of iPhone - isn't mere "marketing strategy," as stated by the FBI. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:46 am
Protecting content v. potential impediments to future innovations. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
Many see the case as a sequel to Seila Law, the recent Supreme Court case related to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
Unfortunately due to an A/V error the link to the hearing was removed. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:20 am
Miller’s Ale House, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
F.T.C. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
| IP: at the rhythm of bossa | AI generated make-up: another IP dilemma to solve? [read post]
