Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 821 - 840 of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 10:58 am by Michael O'Hear
  If one takes the view that a primary reason to punish crack offenders is to respond the risk that crack distribution will result in serious physical injury, it seems odd to punish crack offenses more severely than other risky conduct that actually results in the death of another human being.[10]  To be sure, some crack offenders may also be responsible for actual deaths, but there is an extensive network of specific offense characteristics and mandatory… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Jones, No. 07-5994 In a prosecution for firearm possession by a felon, the District Court's order suppressing evidence is reversed, where the District Court, in assessing whether the officers who arrested Defendant had reasonable suspicion, erred by failing to take into account all information observed by the officers until Defendant yielded to unambiguous police authority. . [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Village of Port Chester, 06-652, a takings case with egregious facts that seemed even to exceed the private-development takings the Court allowed in Kelo v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:56 am by Susan Brenner
After taking [Schlossberg] to the ground, Solesbee told him he was under arrest. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm by Kym Stapleton
  On Monday, in a 4 to 3 ruling, the California Supreme Court held that these sentences were unconstitutional (People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers
Offense that are potentially illegal or life threatening are sent to Sony’s security team, which is what happen with Stratton’s offense. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am by CJLF Staff
Florida to include juveniles convicted of homicide offenses. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:43 am by Paul Levy
  My understanding of this problem is one of the things that impelled me to take this case even though it arises in California, where the rules limiting Doe subpoenas to realistic lawsuits is already well established. [read post]