Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 821 - 840 of 1,480
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
And how many consecutive questions does it take before a reader gets annoyed and skips to the next paragraph? [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:44 pm
 (V) Solicitation to commit murder as defined in Section 653f. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
California (1971), which seemed to limit Feiner to speech “intentionally provoking a given group to hostile reaction. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Defendant was paroled in April 2007 and committed his current offense eight months later. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
California gave short shrift to the idea that the captive audience doctrine might be used to protect viewers in a public space who are exposed to images they deem offensive (Cohen’s “Fuck the Draft” jacket). [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Rptr. 838 (California Court of Appeals 1998). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Take a swig of some good strong coffee because we’ve got a baker’s dozen first-time relists to get through before you pass out/return to your regularly scheduled programming. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
Violation of this law is a misdemeanor criminal offense, see N.C.G.S.A. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:40 am
” But, in 1946, the Supreme Court abrogated that common-law understanding in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
We are making the best arguments we can for the position we are taking; we are not necessarily endorsing it as the position that we think the law ought to take. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:15 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
He sued for violations of the Wiretap Act, Stored Communications Act and Section 502 of the California Penal Code. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
I don't need credit for an attempt, so take that how you want to. [read post]