Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 821 - 840 of 4,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2020, 3:09 pm by snahmod
The Sixth Circuit’s Fourth Amendment tire-chalking decision in Taylor v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 12:45 pm by Giles Peaker
For example: ASTs – landlords in Wales did not have to serve ‘prescribed information’ such as Energy Performance Certificate, Gas Safety Certificate, and certainly not a ‘How to Rent in England’ leaflet at any point, in order to rely on a section 21 notice ASTs – Wales does not (for now) have a defence for ‘retaliatory eviction’ to section 21 notices (many will say of course it has little effect in England either) ASTs – Wales did not amend… [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
The Court also observed that nuisance does not protect privacy in related jurisdictions, referring to the High Court of Australia decision in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor ((1937) 58 CLR 479). [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am by Anna Salvatore
” Margaret Taylor sat down with Scott R. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.* Matter of the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical, Technical… [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.* Matter of the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical, Technical… [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:37 am by SHG
From the perspective of a police officer, as the law requires the shooting be considered under Graham v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
They spoke about what this Trump administration effort reveals about the relationship between presidents and the intelligence community: David Priess shared a Lawfare Live event with the Michael V. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:14 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Supreme Court addressed the EEOC’s methods in the 2015 case Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" ** Article 14 of the New York State Civil Service Law.The decision is posted on the Internet at: https://casetext.com/case/matter-of-chopay-v-town-of-oyster-bay [read post]