Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 15,499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2019, 3:18 pm by Bryan P. Sears
The announcement by House Speaker Michael Busch and Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:39 am
The Eighth Circuit, among the more parsimonious in allowing non-Guidelines sentences, reversed the sentence given to former Wal-Mart vice chairman Thomas Coughlin after his guilty plea for defrauding the company (United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
The Supreme Court issued an opinion affirming the Medicaid Act which permits a state to seek reimbursement from settlement payments allocated for future medical care in Gallardo v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:58 pm by Solomon Wisenberg
What a marvelous dissent by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, joined by judges Pregerson, Reinhardt, Thomas, and Watford, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:27 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law Over a dissent from Justice Scalia, joined by Thomas, the United States Supreme Court decided not to review the closely watched Elmbrook School District v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm by Thomas Dominczyk
  Today the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied a petition for leave to file an interlocutory appeal in the matter of Patrick v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:07 am
Supreme Court in an argued case: Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:30 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Thomas Ashton Leon DeBauche has posted Bursting Bottles: Doubting the Objective-Only Approach to 18 U.S.C. 875(C) in Light of United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by Howard Bashman
State Bar of Wisc., No. 19–831, Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissent, in which Justice Neil M. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 4:54 am
In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Thomas in the case of Bridge et al. v. [read post]