Search for: "Tom Goldstein" Results 821 - 840 of 1,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Tom Goldstein will be a panelist. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:11 pm by Kedar
It is possible that the Chief Justice’s familiarity with the three advocates (Tom Goldstein, Irv Gornstein, and Phillip) in IBP made that setting a more comfortable one for a justice hearing their first oral argument. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
As indicated on the blog earlier, we accepted applications only through this morning. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:57 am
If you are looking for substantial involvement with Supreme Court, appellate, and litigation practices, Akin Gump is currently accepting applications for the position of Appellate Practice Coordinator/ Assistant to Tom Goldstein in the Washington, DC office. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 11:35 am by Jordon Steele
Tom Goldstein, founding of the very popular SCOTUSblog, claimed that bloggers have totally different priorities than librarians and preservationists: bloggers think about the information itself, not the long-term preservation of that information. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:48 am
If you are a recent college graduate looking for substantial involvement with Supreme Court, appellate, and litigation practices, Akin Gump is currently accepting applications for the position of Appellate Practice Coordinator/ Assistant to Tom Goldstein in the Washington, DC office. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:08 pm
Here are links to Webcasts (in QuickTime format; free download available here) and to Professor Tushnet’s notes on each presentation: Welcome and Opening Remarks: Professor Robert Berring (video here [click on "Click here to Play Media"], notes here); Panel I: The Future Research Value of Blogs: Professor Chris Borgen, Professor Lee Peoples, Professor Margaret Schilt (video here [click on "Click here to Play Media"], notes here); Panel II: Blogs and Reliability:… [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 8:16 am
Panel 2: Blogs and Reliability Tom Goldstein, Akin Gump: Startup costs matter: you don't need to find a publisher to get your words out. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:58 pm
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld partner Tom Goldstein discusses the decisions. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
  Tom Goldstein and Kristina Moore have provided commentary and links to the senators' questioning.One of those links is the Washington Post photographic coverage of the hearings.At National Journal, Stuart Taylor is writing a Ninth Justice blog. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:59 am
A zinger from Tom Goldstein's and Kristina Moore's liveblogging of the confirmation hearings yesterday at ScotusBlog: 4:02 - Tom Goldstein: CS [Sen. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 4:30 pm
The panel of folks includes Tom Goldstein, Wendy Long, Mike Seidman, Scott Moss, Ed Whelan, and me. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Our own Live Blog coverage will come from Tom Goldstein and Kristina Moore, who will report from all sessions this week. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
As you might expect from the Federalist Society, the panelists are an ideologically mixed group -- Tom Goldstein, Wendy Long, Prof. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:48 pm
Tags: Advocates, Supreme Court Bar Related posts Washington Post Article on Tom Goldstein and the Supreme Court Vacancy (June 3, 2009) Time to Update the Resume (April 29, 2009) Thoughts on Boumediene Oral Arguments (December 5, 2007) [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 9:12 am
"The Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings as a Non-Event": Tom Goldstein has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:27 am
Tom Goldstein writes one of the most revealing appraisals of the Supreme Court I think I have ever read: I think that the most interesting Justices, by far, were Justices Scalia and Thomas. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:35 am
The Court held it's last public session of the 2008-2009 term today, as noted by Tom Goldstein and his SCOTUS Blog crew. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:31 am
The title of this post is a quote from Tom Goldstein's live-blogging at SCOTUSblog in reaction to the handing down of the final opinions of the 2009 Supreme Court Term. [read post]