Search for: "U.S. District Court for Northern District of California" Results 821 - 840 of 3,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2010, 2:38 am
  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of all women with claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and back pay employed by Wal-Mart at any time after December 26, 1998, and created a separate opt-out class for punitive damages claims. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:33 pm by John Delaney and Aaron Rubin
District Court for the Northern District of California expressed doubts that a federal anti-hacking law—the Computer Fraud & Abuse Act—prohibits the startup’s scraping of such publicly available information from a website, even if the website owner has asked for the scraping to stop. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 1:13 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
On the merits, the district court examined the California Supreme Court’s rationale in McGill. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:42 am by Lazar Radic
District Court for the Northern District of California in Epic Games v Apple, affirming in part and reversing in part the district court’s judgment. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:35 am
Delaware's federal court (~1000 cases), the Central District of California (~ 500 cases) and the Northern District of California (~ 260 cases) came second, third and fourth respectively. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:33 pm by Mike
Northern California judges have recently ruled in a series of civil rights cases. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 5:25 pm by On behalf of Bankruptcy Legal Group
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California, which covers San Diego, were troubling. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:25 pm by Bankruptcy Legal Group
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California, which covers San Diego, were troubling. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 7:21 am by Steven Cohen
Horwedel et al – United States District CourtNorthern District of California – January 18th, 2019) involves a motor vehicle accident between the plaintiff and a U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:57 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a declaratory judgment complaint filed by Impax against Medicis, ruling that the court lacks jurisdiction because there is no case or controversy between the parties. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 7:30 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
District Court for the Northern District of California has certified a class in the consolidated cases Farangis Emami, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Robert Kreisman
The Paxil drug maker, GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (GSK) is defending product-liability lawsuits in Chicago’s federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 1:00 am
Attorney’s Office for Northern District of California and the FBI for their work to bring the defendant to justice and prevent further harm to the San Jose community. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:48 am by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California have ruled in patent cases. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:34 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Whereas some California district courts have attempted to tread a path around this precedent, on March 2, 2020, Judge Bencivengo of the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm by Greg Mersol
  They filed their claims in California state court, but Hertz removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, claiming diversity jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA"), 28  U.S.C. section 1332(d). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Ultimately, the court concluded that Apple failed to demonstrate that the Northern District of California was clearly more convenient and denied the transfer motion. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:59 am by Antitrust Today
Judge James Ware of the Northern District of California has granted a motion for certification of a class of iPhone consumers in an antitrust suit against Apple and AT&T. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:41 am
District Court for the Northern District of California certified a Rule 23(b)(2) class for injunctive and declaratory relief but denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification under Rule 23(b)(3) because plaintiff failed to present a sufficient damages model as required by Comcast v. [read post]