Search for: "US v. McDonald"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 9:46 am
In today’s Leonard v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
When someone at a party mentions the McDonald’s coffee case, a good lawyer can point out the salient facts — McDonald’s had hundreds of prior complaints about how hot its coffee was, the woman was horribly injured, she offered to settle for her medical expenses — between sips of his Cabernet. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am
Montgomery County Board of Revision, BTA Case No. 95-M-855 (May 2, 1997); McDonald Local School District Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm
That ruling, as this court noted in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:59 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 9:24 am
McDonald's Restaurants (1990) 220 Cal. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Witness the difficult issues in Hermes v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
Silbey: Interaction b/t TM and other fields matters here—bankruptcy.Lemley: Lynn LoPucki suggested that we could take franchising more seriously—if you hold yourself out as a McDonald’s, you’re a McDonald’s and your employees are McDonald’s employees.McKenna: confusion isn’t found in nature; you have to know where to look to do a survey and once you ask a set of people you’ve defined a market. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
M v H and P and T (2020) The issue of whether a child should be vaccinated was considered by the Court of Appeal in December 2020 in the case of M v H and P and T. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
This arose in relation to an application to register the word mark 'DUNGEONS', which was opposed by the owners of the EUTM 'Dungeons & Dragons'.Former GuestKat Darren Meale returns to bring us the sixth volume of Retromark, looking back on the last six months of trade marks, from the revoked McDonald's 'Mc' EU trade mark to the most recent Skykick referral and more.You thought you had seen the last of the Rubik's cube? [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:22 pm
In today’s case (Humphrey v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:07 pm
In last week’s case (Humphrey v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:59 am
” At Real Clear Politics, David McDonald points to “the outlines of a consensus” in The American Legion v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald discuss Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
This reliance on history and tradition is similar to the methodology the Court used in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
| EUIPO says McDonald's 'BIG MAC' trade mark may be revoked due to lack of genuine use | “Let Me Be Frank”: Kevin Spacey gambles with infringement | Technicalities in copyright litigation in Nigeria: MCSN v Compact Disc Technology | Mr Justice Nugee grants Philip Morris ex parte pan-EU preliminary injunction for heated tobacco device design | From Star Wars to diversity: An audience with Lady Hale - President of the UK Supreme Court | GPL… [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
Professor Lund, though a supporter of gun rights, was quite critical of the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. [read post]
