Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of"
Results 821 - 840
of 13,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2021, 1:15 pm
Arthrex, Inc., et al., which is scheduled for oral argument on March 1, 2021. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 3:15 am
On April 13, 2017, Broadband iTV, Inc. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:15 am
On November 20, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a modified opinion following a petition for panel rehearing filed by Network-1. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:00 am
On May 19, 2015 the Board of Standards and Appeals voted to grant the applicant, BBD & D Inc, a permit to construct a penthouse at 237 East 72nd Street in the Upper East Side of Manhattan. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
Arthrex, Inc., addressing whether the authority of administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to issue decisions is consistent with the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 1:15 pm
Arthrex, Inc., et al., which is scheduled for oral argument on March 1, 2021. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
ENC Corporation et al., docket number 04-16401, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit resolved the indispensable party issue with respect to the Republic of the Philippines, Arelma, Roxas and Golden Buddha in favor of human rights victims, confirming the Hawaiian district court decision on September 12, 2006. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:11 pm
See, Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
On September 24, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
Arthrex, Inc., addressing whether the authority of administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to issue decisions is consistent with the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
Arthrex, Inc., addressing whether the authority of administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to issue decisions is consistent with the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:44 pm
Earlier today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a major decision interpreting provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA), specifically the AIA on-sale bar provisions. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:47 am
IndyMac MBS, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
Arthrex, Inc., addressing whether the authority of administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to issue decisions is consistent with the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently ruled that designs on cheerleading uniforms are eligible for copyright protection.[1] Varsity Brands, Inc. involved a dispute between two cheerleading apparel and accessory companies regarding whether graphic designs that appear on cheerleading uniforms and warm-ups are subject to copyright protection.[2] The Plaintiff alleged that […] The post Sixth Circuit finds that designs on Cheerleader Uniforms… [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
On February 3, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a preliminary injunction granted by the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
On December 4, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) designated three Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) decisions as precedential. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:15 am
The nation’s highest court will once again address issues surrounding the controversial Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Arthrex, Inc., Nos. 19-1434/-1452/-1458. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
Arthrex, Inc., addressing whether the authority of administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to issue decisions is consistent with the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
