Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 821 - 840
of 9,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Specific concerns may arise for LGBTQ+ foreign nationals seeking to come to the United States, or for LGBTQ+ service members in the U.S. armed forces. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
” (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am
In Coy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:16 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
But that provides a weapon to the great enemy of the Cuban state--the Americans. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
”[8] This text states that a corporation’s cooperation with the government’s investigation is a mitigating factor by which a corporation can gain credit. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The Court had held in 1909 that people who were employed by or received pensions from the United States couldn’t serve as jurors in federal criminal cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:20 am
Aimee Brown argues for the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
United States, she seeks to revisit that conclusion, arguing that because the provisions are avowedly deterrent and non-compensatory, they are subject to the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
In Hammons v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:02 pm
In 1987, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of jailing federal defendants before trial in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
United States 364 U.S. 40 (1960), that the Takings Clause “was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Here, plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden on summary judgment as to their legalmalpractice claim. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Based on this assumption the Court finds that a single family unit is not properly comparable to the unit make up of unrelated disabled residents of a group home. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
It held in General Electric, Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
January 5, 2023 | By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm
Such is the teaching of the First District Court of Appeal’s December 28, 2022 published opinion in Charles Jenkins et al v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
(Basu v. [read post]
