Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 821 - 840 of 14,187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 9:34 pm
Each term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issues a copy of the docket it has selected showing all of the cases that will be heard during that time frame. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm by David Klein
It has been about one year and eight months since the United States Supreme Court released its landmark decision in Facebook v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:39 am by Joel R. Brandes
          Anthimos Panteleris, a citizen of Australia, and Aalison Panteleris, a citizen of the United States, married in the United States in 2005. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Anthimos Panteleris, a citizen of Australia, and Aalison Panteleris, a citizen of the United States, married in the United States in 2005. [read post]
  In addition, the Court held that SecurityPoint is entitled to delay damages as well as additional damages for the United States’ continuing infringement of the patent after the close of fact discovery. [read post]
  In addition, the Court held that SecurityPoint is entitled to delay damages as well as additional damages for the United States’ continuing infringement of the patent after the close of fact discovery. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It is heartening to see the likes of the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Planned Parenthood taking a stand against extreme religious liberty. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:17 am
May 05, 2009)—In this recent case, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York issued an unpublished opinion denying a host of motions to dismiss and granting leave to the plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Complaint. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm by Micah Gates, RWS, WDTN
The Sixth released an interesting published decision today in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am by Gene Quinn
In December 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in a standard essential patent (SEP) appeal involving Ericsson and TCL Communication Technology—a closely watched case that many thought would shed light on what constitutes a FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) offer of a licensing royalty rate relative to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]