Search for: "United States v. FEDERAL COMPANY" Results 821 - 840 of 12,463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
* [i] There have been more than 230 corporate bankruptcy filings in the United States in 2023, according to the latest market intelligence data from S&P Global. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
* [i] There have been more than 230 corporate bankruptcy filings in the United States in 2023, according to the latest market intelligence data from S&P Global. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
A Washington state couple, Charles and Kathleen Moore, went to federal court to challenge the tax. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:50 am by Max Kohn
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm by Florian Mueller
The prize for the economically most nonsensical question I've ever heard an attorney ask a witness in an antitrust case goes to an institution that I hope will recover--the sooner, the better--from its current crisis: the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm by Morgan Cloud
Any injuries he suffered occurred in Russia and could not constitute a domestic injury in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-1557Issue: Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct for which a jury has acquitted the defendant. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
Companies doing business in the Lone Star State may need to revisit their privacy compliance (or lack thereof) and determine whether to create a compliance program for the second-most populous state or fina [read post]