Search for: "United States v. Gray"
Results 821 - 840
of 924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
Supreme Court case and it is an important term discussed, written about, and fought over in Federal and State Courts every day across the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
” If there are fractured opinions in Whitehall, the red-line of immigration control may fade into a fuzzier gray. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am
This is particularly relevant because domestic terrorism occupies a gray area in federal criminal law between international terrorism and nonterrorism criminal offenses. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:02 am
United States,[1]which the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
The United States has long drawn a line between the work of federal employees in public service and the use of such employees for political purposes. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, and chairman of the American Bar Association’s Administrative Law Section. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:35 am
Economic Significance: The United States has more than 130 million fixed-broadband subscribers; the broadband industry generates more than $100 billion in annual revenue and has invested trillions of dollars in infrastructure. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
(within 3 years) A: Letty Lynton and 2025. ____ Q: In Effects Associates v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(IAM) United Kingdom EWHC (Admin) holds defendant’s acquisition of illegally copied audio files would constitute an offence under s. 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Sitek v Circuit Court of Swidnica (1709 Copyright Blog) IPO – Original Bucks Fizz members lose trade mark battle over name (Out-Law) (IPKat) Should the UK facilitate online filing of registered design applications? [read post]
