Search for: "United States v. Levi"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
” The Federal Circuit levied similar criticisms in its February 2010 decision in ResQNet.com Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
Here, plaintiff has presented evidence of a “continuing wrong,” which is “deemed to have accrued on the date of the last wrongful act” (Leonhard v United States, 633 F2d 599, 613 [2d Cir 1980], cert denied 451 US 908 [1981]; Harvey, 34 AD3d at 364). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
United States A Washington D.C based band is suing YouTube, after the website removed its music video. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(Spicy IP) Defining ‘literary works’ for copyright protection (International Law Office) Drafting and interpretation of patent claims (IP Frontline) Israel Israel Patent Office accepts lacks jurisdiction and rules anyway: Karl Storz GmbH & Co v Bausch and Lomb (The IP Factor) Economist report ranks Israel 10th in terms of innovation (The IP Factor) Mauritius Mauritius launches IP sensitivity drive (Afro-IP) Netherlands Presiding… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
On June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
Cybersecurity of the Person, First Amendment Law Review, 2019, Jeff Kosseff, United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:28 am
The Sedition Act, for instance, banned false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress …, or the President …, with intent to defame [them] … or to bring them … into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them … the hatred of the good people of the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
Justice Breyer, who dissented in Apprendi, opposed the extension of that rule to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 7:53 pm
“[M]oneys…due from, or payable by, the United States…to any individual…shall be subject, in like manner…to withholding in accordance with State law…by a State agency administering a program under a State plan approved under this part or by an individual obligee, to enforce the legal obligation of the individual to provide child support or alimony. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
United States, 546 U.S. 142 (2005). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
In 2007, Dana Corporation filed for reorganisation under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code of the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard: Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
