Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 821 - 840 of 10,388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Mykhailo Soldatenko
Last December marked the 28th anniversary of the Budapest Memorandum, in which the United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia provided security commitments to Ukraine in exchange for the latter joining the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear state. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Ryan Goodman
” Indeed, Pomerantz may even mean federal crimes, and not the state crimes that the DA’s Office was investigating. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:56 am by Kenan Farrell
Their logo has not been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am by centerforartlaw
It also highlights and partially explores the difference in the United States and Australian copyright laws with a few case studies of legal issues surrounding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artworks in Australia. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:20 am by Stewart Baker
Details are still a little sparse, but some kind of deal was essential for the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:16 am by Karine Bannelier
Still the Budapest Convention has been adopted by 68 states, including 23 that are not in the Council of Europe (including the United States). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
Saturday, 28 January 2023 marked data protection day. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 9:15 am by Unknown
More info is provided in this blog post.Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (11 Jan. 2023) [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]