Search for: "United States v. Minnesota"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
United States is whether this emerging situation should lead the courts – ultimately, the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:18 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The subsequent class actions, on behalf of United States customers, were consolidated into the District of Minnesota. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
For example, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently issued an injunction in a trademark dispute applying the long-standing (at least in the United States) presumption of irreparable harm in the case Gold’s Gym Licensing LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
The oral argument is scheduled for December 7, 2011 at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:08 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
--Marvin v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:17 am
Respondent noted in the application that she planned on being in the United States for three months. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 7:32 am
Weinberger, United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
Case date: 20 September 2019 Case number: No. 18-2388 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 8:11 am
Paul, Minnesota, ruled in Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm
In Larson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 12:13 pm
The plaintiffs in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 11:20 am
Food-related illness in the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
