Search for: "United States v. Small"
Results 821 - 840
of 6,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
In the United States, rebates are negotiated by PBMs, whose function is to define formularies on behalf of health insurers. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:59 am
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Rachel Kovner seemed to make somewhat inconsistent arguments. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
Rehearing granted and modified opinion issued in arbitration case: Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Corp.
2 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
: “The final phrase of [title 9, United States Codes, section 2] . [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Garcia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:22 pm
Just when we might be resting on our Gall/Kimbrough/Regalado laurels, along comes United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:27 am
As I reported on Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
It's no longer a secret to which three judges the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has assigned the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:58 am
A recent federal Tax Court case, Moore v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
This clause states, in part, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:14 am
Facts: This case (Wilks v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Protect Telegraph Hill v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Protect Telegraph Hill v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:30 am
United States, 674 F.3d 621 (7th Cir. 2011).You tell em Judge Hill. [read post]
