Search for: "United States v. Thomas"
Results 821 - 840
of 7,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
Instead, he discussed the situation with other detectives in his unit, and together they came to the conclusion exigent circumstances existed to seize [Thomas'] computer without a warrant. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT'---~F;:U'l";;ED;::---U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:53 am
Thomas: Ineffective assistance of counsel on state collateral review as cause for a procedural default.Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:09 am
The lead majority opinion begins, "Both parties to this case are members of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:48 am
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
Thomas Ludden. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:23 pm
Justice Kagan also noted the similarity between this case and United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 3:16 am
While some courts have strictly applied Bruen, many would argue that in its most recent Second Amendment case, United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Wade and Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
Accordingly, we held—without qualification—that "the powers delegated to Congress under Article I of the United States Constitution do not include the power to subject nonconsenting States to private suits for damages in state courts. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:03 pm
Tsige, however, the case appears to signal an increasing willingness to expand the scope of privacy torts in Canada and to follow the United States in doing so. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
Mitchell v. Wisconsin – Supreme Court Analyzes Exigency in the Context of an Unconscious DWI Suspect
5 Jul 2019, 3:43 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:45 pm
In State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 4:32 pm
When the Nixon administration attempted to impound funds across the federal budget, the Supreme Court heard two cases challenging the impoundment of EPA funds designated for state and municipal grants. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court called a special session and heard oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
