Search for: "United States v. White" Results 821 - 840 of 6,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm by Rantanen
Waxman representing i4i, and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart arguing as amicus curiae on behalf of the United States in support of i4i. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:11 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
United States, the Court remanded a case for resentencing where the defendant complained that he was not an Armed Career Criminal. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm by Anonymous
Padilla was an al Queda solider who formerly fought against the United States and ordering the Secretary to take Mr. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:59 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Earlier this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently recognized that “Hispanic” is a race for purposes of two federal anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:43 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
, the United States Supreme Court issued its first decision interpreting the so-called white collar exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act and finally resolved the circuit split over whether pharmaceutical sales representatives are exempt as outside salespeople. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
  If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
:  GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]