Search for: "Unknown Corrections Officers" Results 821 - 840 of 1,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2008, 12:38 pm
To this day, I have not been shown the memoranda produced by the Office of Legal Counsel to support the basis for the program! [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
In appropriate circumstances this includes consideration of the Article 10 rights of anyone, party or not, who would be restrained from publishing the specified category of information (X v Persons Unknown [2009] EMLR 290). [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:19 pm
OpenOffice is intended to be an alternative to the Microsoft Office suite and other commercial productivity tools. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:12 am by Rohini Kurup, Jonathan Shaub
  If our theory is correct, the Justice Department’s clear statement in its Meadows brief that testimonial immunity does not apply means that, from this point forward, no senior adviser to Trump—including Meadows or Scavino—has a viable defense to contempt for refusing to comply with the committee’s subpoenas. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection Two Freedom of Information Act requests by Mishcon de Reya to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) have revealed that a number of reprimands have been issued against the Government Digital Service (part of the Cabinet Office), UKIP and the CPS, as well as a number of police forces and other public bodies. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
  Its chair, Sir Alan Moses, wrongly claimed that it had forced 18 front page corrections. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
United States The US Copyright Office has rejected an attempt to register copyright in an image generated by AI tools. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:34 pm
David Butler Jones (Chief Public Health Officer, Public Health Agency of Canada, Department of Health): I think the science speaks for itself. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Federal officer cases may be analogous, but CAFA is expressly made subject to §1447(c). [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Coming into the fourth quarter of 2022, D&Os are operating in a fickle stock market while grappling with heightened global tensions, managing gross economic uncertainty driven by untamable inflation, restructuring supply chains, institutionalizing ESG and managing a gripey work force reluctant to return to their physical office location.[4]   As a result, according to a recent Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz client memo, corporations must adapt and adopt fit-for-purpose… [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
Sometimes things that are recorded against the property are mistakes and the mistakes can be corrected if everyone involved is willing. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Judge Buchwald credited the testimony of the general partner’s managing member that he instructed an employee at his office to send the email to all the limited partners (each of whom was addressed in the email) and that he had no reason to believe she did not do so. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
In our judgement it is correct. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:06 am
In Silverthorne, the Government, “without a shadow of authority[,] went to the office of [the defendants'] company and made a clean sweep of all the books, papers and documents found there. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
An autopsy did show a scar from a previous heart attack, but it was unknown when this occurred. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, which allows lawsuits against federal officers for violations of constitutional rights. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am by Lyle Denniston
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents; it involved the forced entry into an apartment in New York City and other misconduct by federal drug officers, who had no warrant. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Information Commissioner’s Office said a breach notification was reviewed and it was determined no further action was needed. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
Plaintiff is correct that if the waiting period laws do not pass intermediate scrutiny, they will not pass strict scrutiny. [read post]