Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 1" Results 821 - 840 of 2,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2009, 1:23 pm by NL
CPR 55(1), the modern form, is also quite specific – these are claims for ‘recovery of possession of land’ (55(1)(a)) or ‘recovery of land’ against trespassers (55(1)(b)). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm by Bexis
Dec. 15, 2011), the moving defendants all received summary judgment, so it was just the best of times. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
Bernardin allegedly thereby obtained access to Sewell's electronic communications and other personal information and sent messages purporting to be from her.On May 15, 2013, Sewell filed a separate suit against Bernardin's wife, Tara Bernardin, and `John Does # 1–5,’ apparently believing that Tara Bernardin and others unknown to her had gained access to her Internet accounts. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lexmark has crept into §43(a)(1)(A) via false endorsement; it will be interesting to see whether courts recognize that other trademark claims are likewise subject to a proximate cause requirement by that logic. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:44 pm by Josephine Liu
  Plaintiff Patrick Burrows, who was a Winn-Dixie employee, claimed that an unknown person used his compromised PII to file a false tax return under his name, leaving him unable to collect his tax refund. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:46 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
To discuss your case in more detail, do not hesitate to contact us at 1-877-499-HURT (4878) or contact us online today. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Ryan Blay
  They might even hire their own law firm to defend themselves against….themselves. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:24 am by David M. Boertje
San Diego Drug Crimes and Synthetic Drugs Lawyer The Law Offices of David Boertje has defended many serious drug charges. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm
The implications are clear: Anyone who attempts to stifle the open Internet must contend with the millions of Internet users prepared to defend it.But this particular fight is not yet over. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm
The implications are clear: Anyone who attempts to stifle the open Internet must contend with the millions of Internet users prepared to defend it.But this particular fight is not yet over. [read post]