Search for: "Wang v. Wang" Results 821 - 840 of 863
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2008, 12:44 pm
Case Name: Jacobs Ranch Coal Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:25 pm
As described by the First Circuit in the unpublished Rusli v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
constantly question your assumptions:  am I really understanding what this person is saying or their body language is communicating exercise patience, persistence and humility show respect Americans have different cultural backgrounds even when they "look" American because  cultural background is not always apparent from physical appearance, accent, gesture and the like suing Asians very difficult thereafter to settle very public… [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:25 am
There's also the danger that information obtained through torture will be introduced in the military commissions, in violation of more than 200 years of American law and values.We also just posted a podcast of Cecillia Wang, Senior Staff Attorney for the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, giving her observations of the Boumediene v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 2:19 pm
Last night Cecillia Wang wrote about the possible outcomes from today's Supreme Court oral argument in Boumediene v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:41 am
  See Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980), enfd. 662 f.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
" The trial court's reading of plaintiffs' allegations is unduly narrow and inconsistent with the mandate to construe the CLRA liberally ( § 1760; Wang v. [read post]