Search for: "Wells v. Hand"
Results 821 - 840
of 18,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2008, 6:56 pm
" (Graham v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
Today the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Mayo v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 2:31 am
In this case, Delgado v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Wygant v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
That being so, if I could be reasonably confident that all the necessary guidance from the ECJ would be forthcoming in its judgments on one or more of the existing references, then it might well make sense for to me to do as M & S urge and stay the proceedings until sufficient guidance is available: compare Johns v Solent SD Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 790 and Boehringer Ingelheim KG v Swingward Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 83, [2008] ETMR 36. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Bowman v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 6:03 am
Shareholder activism is often thought of in binary terms: activist v. company, dissident nominees v. company directors. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:56 am
Circuit in ACA International v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:26 pm
Judge Jenneman, however, relied on language from the 1992 Supreme Court case of Dewsnup v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:37 am
Well, of course it can, in the hands of a kung fu master like Bruce Lee. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:09 pm
D, on the other hand, is very well aware that a given legal theory requires elements A, B, C, and D to be established (every single one of them), and wishes to emphasize that by God P has done nothing to establish C (nothing! [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Universal Pictures, as precedent.Nichols v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:05 am
With the Supreme Court seemingly poised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:26 am
Those policies serve to keep sensitive information from getting into the hands of others, as well as to control the amount of physical and digital memory space needed to store documents. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:50 pm
If you don't like the case, the case never existed: Ordinarily, the decision to settle a case while an appeal is pending means giving up the opportunity to set a legal precedent as well as forgoing the chance to win a reversal of any unfavorable published decisions handed down by the lower court.But a team of defense lawyers fighting to overturn a $24 million verdict have figured out a way to have their settlement cake and eat their jurisprudence, too.The… [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:00 pm
Rockwood v Patterson Thuente Skaar [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:29 am
However, we are both being beaten hands down by "CowboyNeal", a well liked Slashdot editor. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:16 pm
The court distinguished between mootness that occurs as a result of settlement, on the one hand, and mootness that happens by, well, happenstance, on the other. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 4:54 pm
On the other hand, if the court finds that adequate provision has not been made, then the court may consider the claimant’s circumstances, as well as those of the other beneficiaries, at the date of trial, taking into account changes since death, when deciding what provision is “adequate, just and equitable. [read post]
